Modular symbols attached to elliptic curves over \(\QQ\)#
To an elliptic curve \(E\) over the rational numbers with conductor \(N\), one can associate a space of modular symbols of level \(N\), because \(E\) is known to be modular. The space is two-dimensional and contains a subspace on which complex conjugation acts as multiplication by \(+1\) and one on which it acts by \(-1\).
There are three implementations of modular symbols, two within
Sage
and one in Cremona’s eclib
library.
One can choose here which one is used.
Associated to \(E\) there is a canonical generator in each space. They are maps \([.]^+\) and \([.]^{-}\), both \(\QQ \to\QQ\). They are normalized such that
where \(f\) is the newform associated to the isogeny class of \(E\) and \(\Omega^{+}\) is the smallest positive period of the Néron differential of \(E\) and \(\Omega^{-}\) is the smallest positive purely imaginary period. Note that it depends on \(E\) rather than on its isogeny class.
From eclib
version v20161230, both plus and minus symbols are
available and are correctly normalized. In the Sage
implementation, the computation of the space provides initial
generators which are not necessarily correctly normalized; here we
implement two methods that try to find the correct scaling factor.
Modular symbols are used to compute \(p\)-adic \(L\)-functions.
EXAMPLES:
sage: E = EllipticCurve("19a1")
sage: m = E.modular_symbol()
sage: m(0)
1/3
sage: m(1/17)
-2/3
sage: m2 = E.modular_symbol(-1, implementation="sage")
sage: m2(0)
0
sage: m2(1/5)
1/2
sage: V = E.modular_symbol_space()
sage: V
Modular Symbols subspace of dimension 1 of Modular Symbols space of dimension 2
for Gamma_0(19) of weight 2 with sign 1 over Rational Field
sage: V.q_eigenform(30)
q - 2*q^3 - 2*q^4 + 3*q^5 - q^7 + q^9 + 3*q^11 + 4*q^12 - 4*q^13 - 6*q^15 + 4*q^16
- 3*q^17 + q^19 - 6*q^20 + 2*q^21 + 4*q^25 + 4*q^27 + 2*q^28 + 6*q^29 + O(q^30)
For more details on modular symbols consult the following
REFERENCES:
AUTHORS:
William Stein (2007): first version
Chris Wuthrich (2008): add scaling and reference to eclib
John Cremona (2016): reworked eclib interface
- class sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_modular_symbols.ModularSymbol#
Bases:
SageObject
A modular symbol attached to an elliptic curve, which is the map \(\QQ\to \QQ\) obtained by sending \(r\) to the normalized symmetrized (or anti-symmetrized) integral \(\infty\) to \(r\).
This is as defined in [MTT1986], but normalized to depend on the curve and not only its isogeny class as in [SW2013].
See the documentation of
E.modular_symbol()
in elliptic curves over the rational numbers for help.- base_ring()#
Return the base ring for this modular symbol.
EXAMPLES:
sage: m = EllipticCurve('11a1').modular_symbol() sage: m.base_ring() Rational Field
- elliptic_curve()#
Return the elliptic curve of this modular symbol.
EXAMPLES:
sage: m = EllipticCurve('11a1').modular_symbol() sage: m.elliptic_curve() Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + y = x^3 - x^2 - 10*x - 20 over Rational Field
- sign()#
Return the sign of this elliptic curve modular symbol.
EXAMPLES:
sage: m = EllipticCurve('11a1').modular_symbol() sage: m.sign() 1 sage: m = EllipticCurve('11a1').modular_symbol(sign=-1, implementation="sage") sage: m.sign() -1
- class sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_modular_symbols.ModularSymbolECLIB(E, sign, nap=1000)#
Bases:
ModularSymbol
Modular symbols attached to \(E\) using
eclib
.Note that the normalization used within
eclib
differs from the normalization chosen here by a factor of 2 in the case of elliptic curves with negative discriminant (with one real component) since the convention there is to write the above integral as \([r]^{+}x+[r]^{-}yi\), where the lattice is \(\left<2x,x+yi\right>\), so that \(\Omega^{+}=2x\) and \(\Omega^{-}=2yi\). We allow for this below.INPUT:
E
– an elliptic curvesign
– an integer, -1 or 1nap
– (int, default 1000): the number of ap of E to use in determining the normalisation of the modular symbols.
EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_modular_symbols import ModularSymbolECLIB sage: E = EllipticCurve('11a1') sage: M = ModularSymbolECLIB(E,+1) sage: M Modular symbol with sign 1 over Rational Field attached to Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + y = x^3 - x^2 - 10*x - 20 over Rational Field sage: M(0) 1/5 sage: E = EllipticCurve('11a2') sage: M = ModularSymbolECLIB(E,+1) sage: M(0) 1
This is a rank 1 case with vanishing positive twists:
sage: E = EllipticCurve('121b1') sage: M = ModularSymbolECLIB(E,+1) sage: M(0) 0 sage: M(1/7) 1/2 sage: M = EllipticCurve('121d1').modular_symbol(implementation="eclib") sage: M(0) 2 sage: E = EllipticCurve('15a1') sage: [C.modular_symbol(implementation="eclib")(0) for C in E.isogeny_class()] [1/4, 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 1/8, 1/16, 1/2, 1]
Since github issue #10256, the interface for negative modular symbols in eclib is available:
sage: E = EllipticCurve('11a1') sage: Mplus = E.modular_symbol(+1); Mplus Modular symbol with sign 1 over Rational Field attached to Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + y = x^3 - x^2 - 10*x - 20 over Rational Field sage: [Mplus(1/i) for i in [1..11]] [1/5, -4/5, -3/10, 7/10, 6/5, 6/5, 7/10, -3/10, -4/5, 1/5, 0] sage: Mminus = E.modular_symbol(-1); Mminus Modular symbol with sign -1 over Rational Field attached to Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + y = x^3 - x^2 - 10*x - 20 over Rational Field sage: [Mminus(1/i) for i in [1..11]] [0, 0, 1/2, 1/2, 0, 0, -1/2, -1/2, 0, 0, 0]
The scaling factor relative to eclib’s normalization is 1/2 for curves of negative discriminant:
sage: [E.discriminant() for E in cremona_curves([14])] [-21952, 941192, -1835008, -28, 25088, 98] sage: [E.modular_symbol()._scaling for E in cremona_curves([14])] [1/2, 1, 1/2, 1/2, 1, 1]
TESTS (for github issue #10236):
sage: E = EllipticCurve('11a1') sage: m = E.modular_symbol(implementation="eclib") sage: m(1/7) 7/10 sage: m(0) 1/5
If
nap
is too small, the normalization in eclib used to be incorrect (see github issue #31317), but sinceeclib
version v20210310 the value ofnap
is increased automatically byeclib
:sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_modular_symbols import ModularSymbolECLIB sage: E = EllipticCurve('1590g1') sage: m = ModularSymbolECLIB(E, sign=+1, nap=300) sage: [m(a/5) for a in [1..4]] [13/2, -13/2, -13/2, 13/2]
These values are correct, and increasing
nap
has no effect. The correct values may verified by the numerical implementation:sage: m = ModularSymbolECLIB(E, sign=+1, nap=400) sage: [m(a/5) for a in [1..4]] [13/2, -13/2, -13/2, 13/2] sage: m = E.modular_symbol(implementation='num') sage: [m(a/5) for a in [1..4]] [13/2, -13/2, -13/2, 13/2]
- class sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_modular_symbols.ModularSymbolSage(E, sign, normalize='L_ratio')#
Bases:
ModularSymbol
Modular symbols attached to \(E\) using
sage
.INPUT:
E
– an elliptic curvesign
– an integer, -1 or 1normalize
– either ‘L_ratio’ (default), ‘period’, or ‘none’; For ‘L_ratio’, the modular symbol is correctly normalized by comparing it to the quotient of \(L(E,1)\) by the least positive period for the curve and some small twists. The normalization ‘period’ uses the integral_period_map for modular symbols and is known to be equal to the above normalization up to the sign and a possible power of 2. For ‘none’, the modular symbol is almost certainly not correctly normalized, i.e. all values will be a fixed scalar multiple of what they should be. But the initial computation of the modular symbol is much faster, though evaluation of it after computing it won’t be any faster.
EXAMPLES:
sage: E = EllipticCurve('11a1') sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_modular_symbols import ModularSymbolSage sage: M = ModularSymbolSage(E, +1) sage: M Modular symbol with sign 1 over Rational Field attached to Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + y = x^3 - x^2 - 10*x - 20 over Rational Field sage: M(0) 1/5 sage: E = EllipticCurve('11a2') sage: M = ModularSymbolSage(E, +1) sage: M(0) 1 sage: M = ModularSymbolSage(E, -1) sage: M(1/3) 1/2
This is a rank 1 case with vanishing positive twists. The modular symbol is adjusted by -2:
sage: E = EllipticCurve('121b1') sage: M = ModularSymbolSage(E, -1, normalize='L_ratio') sage: M(1/3) 1 sage: M._scaling 1 sage: M = EllipticCurve('121d1').modular_symbol(implementation="sage") sage: M(0) 2 sage: M = EllipticCurve('121d1').modular_symbol(implementation="sage", ....: normalize='none') sage: M(0) 1 sage: E = EllipticCurve('15a1') sage: [C.modular_symbol(implementation="sage", normalize='L_ratio')(0) ....: for C in E.isogeny_class()] [1/4, 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 1/8, 1/16, 1/2, 1] sage: [C.modular_symbol(implementation="sage", normalize='period')(0) ....: for C in E.isogeny_class()] [1/8, 1/16, 1/8, 1/4, 1/16, 1/32, 1/4, 1/2] sage: [C.modular_symbol(implementation="sage", normalize='none')(0) ....: for C in E.isogeny_class()] [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
- sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_modular_symbols.modular_symbol_space(E, sign, base_ring, bound=None)#
Creates the space of modular symbols of a given sign over a give base_ring, attached to the isogeny class of the elliptic curve
E
.INPUT:
E
– an elliptic curve over \(\QQ\)sign
– integer, -1, 0, or 1base_ring
– ringbound
– (default: None) maximum number of Hecke operators to use to cut out modular symbols factor. If None, use enough to provably get the correct answer.
OUTPUT: a space of modular symbols
EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_modular_symbols import modular_symbol_space sage: E = EllipticCurve('11a1') sage: M = modular_symbol_space(E, -1, GF(37)) # optional - sage.rings.finite_rings sage: M # optional - sage.rings.finite_rings Modular Symbols space of dimension 1 for Gamma_0(11) of weight 2 with sign -1 over Finite Field of size 37